“And so suddenly, we had this archeological evidence that demonstrated
the book of Daniel was exactly right on all that”.
Titus M. Kennedy
Taken from:
https://www.crosswalk.com/headlines/contributors/michael-foust/archaeology-demonstrates-the-reliability-of-the-bible-leading-archaeologist-says.html
Archaeology 'Demonstrates the Reliability
of the Bible,' Leading Archaeologist Says
• Michael FoustCrosswalk Headlines Contributor
• UpdatedSep 09, 2022
One of the world's top biblical archaeologists says excavations in and around Israel are affirming the reliability of Scripture and attesting to its truthfulness.
Titus M. Kennedy, a professional field archaeologist and the author of two books on the subject – Excavating the Evidence for Jesus and Unearthing the Bible – said this week that archaeology can be "practical for the average Christian."
"It's not just for people that are into adventure, it's not just for academics," Kennedy said on a new episode of TBN's Takeaways with Kirk Cameron. "It's something that can help to enrich your understanding of the Bible because it gives you a view of the ancient world, the ancient context of the Bible, so you can better visualize it. … It demonstrates the reliability of the Bible. You don't have to be always questioning the Bible without any answers. We can question: What's the evidence for this? Well, very often, there's something that's been found that can help answer that question."
Kennedy, an adjunct professor at Biola University and a research fellow at the Discovery Institute, referenced archaeological discoveries involving two Old Testament characters: Belshazzar and David.
"For a long time, there was no other known mention of Belshazzar outside of the book of Daniel," he said. "And so scholars who were skeptical of the Old Testament or the book of Daniel would say, 'Look, here's just another piece of evidence showing us that Daniel is a fictional story that was written hundreds of years later.'"
That changed when researchers uncovered two ancient Babylonian documents, Kennedy said. One of the documents mentioned a Babylonian king, Nabonidus, who "entrusted the kingship to his oldest son and heir," Kennedy said. Another document "tells us that the firstborn son and heir of Nabonidus, his name was Belshazzar.
"And so suddenly, we had this archeological evidence that demonstrated the book of Daniel was exactly right on all that," Kennedy said.
Similarly, secular scholars often doubted the existence of David, too.
"But then in 1993, they found this broken, stele [slab]," Kennedy said. "... This particular one was to commemorate an event, a victory, of the Arameans over Israel. And in one section, it talks about some kings of Israel that these Arameans defeated. And then it says that they are from the house of David. So that was a way of saying the dynasty of David. … That was acknowledging David was the founder of their dynasty of Israelite kings. And so right away, then, people had to change their ideas on the historicity of David."
There is extra-biblical evidence for the New Testament, too, Kennedy said.
"The trial of Jesus is one of the better-attested events, archaeologically," he said, referencing several figures in the story: Annas, Caiaphas, Pontius Pilate, Herod Antipas, Jesus and Peter.
"All six of these people are attested archaeologically and in ancient historical documents," Kennedy said. "And the locations where the trial of Jesus happened are also known."
….
And from J-P Mauro (2018):
https://aleteia.org/2018/06/15/archaeological-evidence-of-pontius-pilate-corroborates-gospel
The archaeological evidence of Pontius Pilate
….
The “Pilate Stone” recorded Pilate’s name and position in a dedication to the Emperor. Almost everyone is familiar with Pontius Pilate and his role in the Passion of Christ. However, very little of the man is known besides his arbitration of the trial of the Nazarene. It is known that he was the Roman prefect who ruled over Judea during the reign of Emperor Tiberius (14-37 AD), but aside from his presence in the Gospels, a few brief references from Roman historians, and a smattering of coins purportedly minted by the prefect, there is very little evidence that Pilate existed at all.
….
That was until the 1961 discovery of the “Pilate Stone,” a piece of carved limestone inscribed with the name of Pontius Pilate.
Italian archaeologist Dr. Antonio Frova and his team came across the “Pilate Stone” while excavating an ancient Roman theatre in Caesarea, Israel, which was built by the decree of King Herod, around 10 BC. UCatholic.com explains that Pilate had his base of operations in Caesarea, which replaced Jerusalem as the administrative capital of Judea in 6 AD.
Creative Commons
Although weathered by time, fragments of the inscription on the limestone may still be distinguished. From what archaeologists can read, it appears to be a dedication stone. It says:
To the Divine Augusti [this] Tiberieum
… Pontius Pilate
… prefect of Judea
… has dedicated [this]
This discovery corroborates Pilate’s position as prefect of Judea, as well as the era in which he held office. UCatholic notes that there are several other secular sources that mention the prefect, such as the writings by Flavius in Antiquities of the Jews circa 94, Philo of Alexandra in On The Embassy of Gauis, and by Publius Cornelius Tacitus, one of the most well-known Roman historians.
However, these works were all written many decades after Pilate was removed from his position as prefect of Judea. The “Pilate Stone” remains the only first-hand evidence of Pilate, which, quite literally, has set his historical relevance in stone.
Comments