Posts

Recognising the historical Daniel

Image
    by    Damien F. Mackey     A potential Babylonian name for Daniel’s Belteshazzar – amongst various possibilities – would be, say, Nabû-bul-li ṭ -su (Nabu-bullitsu), somewhat imperfectly transliterated as Belteshazzar. The name Nabu - bullitsu can be found listed e.g. in the Index (p. 159) of Sir W. Budge’s “Babylonian Life and History”.     Introduction   What are we looking for here?   Essentially, in the case of the historical Daniel, we would be hoping to find a governor of (the province of) Babylon, of very long floruit, at the time of King Nebuchednezzar ‘the Great’, the Chaldean (c. 600 BC). He ought to have a Belteshazzar like name (Daniel 1:7).   My revision will allow for this governor to be identified amongst the various alter egos that I have proposed for King Nebuchednezzar - great identities such as Esarhaddon; Ashurbanipal (and the like-named Ashurnasirpal); and Nabonidus. ...

Four great kings self-identified as ‘son of a nobody’ – or was this just the one mighty ruler?

Image
  by Damien F. Mackey     Here, I have selected four names, Esarhaddon, Ashurbanipal, Nabopolassar and Nabonidus, whom I have identified in various articles as only one king. For example:   Aligning Neo-Babylonia with Book of Daniel   (2) Aligning Neo-Babylonia with the Book of Daniel   and:   Nabopolassar a great king if only one could find him   (2) Nabopolassar a great king if only one could find him   Specifying status as ‘Son of a nobody’   Another common key-word (buzz word), or phrase, for these king-names would be ‘son of a nobody’, pertaining to a prince who was not expecting to be elevated to kingship.   Thus I had previously introduced Ashurbanipal-as-Nebuchednezzar/Nabonidus with the statement: “Nabonidus is   not singular   either in   not expecting   to become   king. Ashurbanipal had   felt the same”.   Now, Esarhaddon is presented by Mattias Karlsson, as a likely ‘son o...