Posts

Thutmose IV may be Thutmose III procrusteanised, cut off really short

-
Image
    by   Damien F. Mackey     Added to this, Brian Alm has noted that reliefs of Thutmose IV actually refer to his Heb Sed festival (“Thutmose IV: Placeholder or Pivot?”). This usually indicated that the King of Egypt had attained to three decades of reign.       In the ancient king lists we find kings and pharaohs, duplicated and even triplicated. This comment applies to e.g. the Egyptian dynastic lists, the Assyro-Babylonian (Chaldean) king lists, and to the Medo-Persian lists.     Archaeological data just cannot support so many kings as arise from these chaotic lists. On this, see e.g. my article:   Medo-Persian history has no adequate archaeology   (6) Medo-Persian history has no adequate archaeology   A most significant instance of duplication arises, so I would suggest, in the middle part of Egypt’s famous Eighteenth Dynasty :   Has Egypt’s Eighteenth Dynasty succ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Pompey ‘the Great’ fake

-
Image
  by   Damien F. Mackey     Conventional ancient Roman history/chronology needs to be subjected to revisionist scrutiny just as we found to have been the case with ancient Egypt and the Near East. This article will be a continuation of efforts towards trying to determine whether the seemingly impregnable fortress of conventional ancient Roman history is firmly based, or if it, too, might be susceptible to breaches when revisionist pressure is applied.      Introduction   That the received Roman history may not be as formidably secure as may have been thought I hope that I have demonstrated – without initially having considered it to have been necessary – in articles such as:   Rome surprisingly minimal in Bible   (11) Rome surprisingly minimal in Bible   Horrible Histories. Retracting Romans   (12) Horrible Histories. Retracting Romans   Jesus Christ was the Model for some legend...
Post a Comment
Read more