Posts

The historical basis for that wonderful, nutty Heraclius

Image
  by   Damien F. Mackey       “ Heraclius seems to have one foot in Davidic Israel, one in the old Roman Republic, and, whatever feet may be left, in the Christian era. What a mix of a man is this emperor Heraclius! What a conundrum! What a puzzle!”   Introduction   The supposed Byzantine emperor, Heraclius (610-641 AD), is a total historical mis-fit. And an hilarious one at that! In an exchange, today (5 th October, 2026), with other interested persons, I wrote:   …. My big problem with the larger-than-life Jay Smith, though, and with Patricia Crone, is that they greatly complicate matters, becoming almost unreadable, unlistenable, by trying to consider Mohammed in a murky conventional C7th AD context. Those Germans who have been radically revising what we have called AD history, and who have been removing the ‘Dark Ages’ – {many of whose conclusions I personally would not accept, I need to say} - have a much be...

Emperor Nero of wicked repute

Image
  by Damien F. Mackey     Who, then, was this Nero?   Where does Nero fit into this list of kings?   And can Nero be the man-beast numbered 666 in John’s Revelation 13:18?     Introduction   The emperor Nero I have found extremely difficult to slot into an appropriate time frame in my revision of ancient history.   In this sense, Nero has been for me like - in the case of Assyrian history - the difficult Ashurnasirpal, or his presumed (but not actual) son-successor, Shalmaneser so-called III.   In earlier times I would simply have considered Nero as – just as the text books tell us – a Roman emperor who reigned in the era thereby assigned to him, after Claudius.   The conventional (or text book) succession of Roman rulers is given as follows:   1st century AD   (Julius Caesar) Augustus  (27 bce–14 ce) Tiberius  (14–37 ce) Caligula  (...