One or two villains: Sejanus and Tigellinus?
“This paper investigates the striking similarities in the
characterization
of Aelius Sejanus and Ofonius Tigellinus in
Tacitus’ Annales”.
The vision
of the “evil genius” is a familiar one in our society. From numerous
representations in film, literature and political satire, we have come to
recognize the shadowy figure of the malevolent puppet-master. Such a character,
however, is not absent from the histories of ancient Rome. This paper
investigates the striking similarities in the characterization of Aelius
Sejanus and Ofonius Tigellinus in Tacitus’ Annales. While there has been
quite a bit of scholarly work done on characterization in the Annales, I
shall expand on this research by focusing on these two figures, who do much to
shape the legacies of their respective administrations.
Sejanus
and Tigellinus, two of the greatest villains in Julio-Claudian history, exhibit
several notable parallels: both are in high positions of power in the empire,
acting as close advisors to the emperor; both earn the distrust and disdain of
the populace; and it is due (at least in part) to associations with these men
that both Tiberius and Nero suffer.
Stephen
Daitz and Inez Scott Ryberg offer excellent discussions of the role of
characterization in the history of the early empire. As Daitz explains,
“Tacitus felt compelled to explain events in terms of personal forces, i.e. the
traits of human personality. Since so many of the events were of a grim and
unpleasant nature, it followed that the characters of those causing these
events were bound to be equally grim and unpleasant” (Daitz - 1960).
Often the
most compelling portrayals are those of villains, whereas “the virtuous are
pale by comparison” (Daitz – 1960). It is from such scholarship that I wish to
build upon our historiographical knowledge of the reigns of Tiberius and Nero.
Whereas Daitz and Ryberg give much more room to the characterization of the
emperors themselves, my research will shift the focus to these two men at the
emperors’ sides.
I wish to
draw special attention to how they are introduced and described, how they rise
to power, and the implications of their presence, while exploring the literary
techniques that Daitz and Ryberg examine in their studies. The language Tacitus
employs is calculated, used to elicit certain responses from the reader and to
direct sympathies elsewhere. The characters of the wicked, wily advisors are
colorful devices to convey Tacitus’ pessimism about the institution of empire.
Given his
disillusionment, it is no wonder that we witness such dark characters as
Sejanus and Tigellinus, accomplices and agitators to imperial excess.
….
For further
relevant comparisons, see Damien Mackey’s article:
Tiberius Claudius Nero knew how to bring the
house down
(6) Tiberius
Claudius Nero knew how to bring the house down

Comments